Help in responding to the common strawman argument of “People who reject masks or jabccines are stupid…”

Help in responding to the common strawman argument of \"People who reject masks or jabccines are stupid because they accept seat belts to mitigate risk in car accidents\" (or something along those lines).

This is a perfect example of a strawman argument being used to demean, diminish and distract from a real and meaningful debate. If you come across this and you are wondering how to respond, this list might help.

The comparison of rejecting masks or jabccines to rejecting seat belts would be more accurate if:

1. The seatbelt was surgically attached or inserted into your body.

2. Seatbelts were installed in all benches and seats everywhere regardless of lack of risk.

3. You had to wear your seat belt in order to walk into any building.

4. You were forced to drive everywhere instead of allowing the choice to walk or ride bikes or scooters etc.

5. Children were strapped into their school desks or tied into their prams.

6. Seatbelts were required to protect you from getting cancer or diabetes.

7. Seatbelts were required on beds or in the bath or on toilets (and surveillance is installed in these locations to ensure compliance).

8. Seatbelts only had one size and no matter what your physical shape, we all had to wear the same one.

9. There was no adjustment or allowance for physical disability.

10. You had to keep your seatbelt on and were not allowed out of the car for any reason, even if your car was on fire or was underwater.

11. Devices were installed everywhere that would monitor your seatbelt and would force it to strap you to any surface you touched.

12. The CHOICE to not drive and instead choose a mode of transportation that is cleaner or promotes health is demonized and such choices are associated with being a sociopath.

13. The media and authorities and general public mock or ignore anyone injured by a seatbelt, neither providing compensation or allowing them to speak about it to others via censorship. Injuries caused by seatbelts are common and include:

Abdominal Injuries

Bone Fracture

Brain Injury

Bruising

Chest injuries

Concussion

Disfigurement

Head Injury

Internal Bleeding

Internal Injury

Paralysis

Paraplegia

Shoulder Injury

Spinal Cord Damage

14. Seat belts are made with a number of untested and unknown chemicals that cause unintended medical conditions like cancer or neurological damage over the long term.

Comments

We Are Going To Run Out Of Food! — 7 Reasons There’s Going To Be A World Wide Famine

In this article, I’m going to explain why he’s right. Here are 7 reasons a global famine is just around the corner: 1. Record-Breaking Floods Floods are the most common natural disaster in the world, and they’re becoming more common and more deadly every year. This is the direct result of climate change. As the air gets warmer, it’s able to hold more moisture. In fact, for every degree Celsius rise in temperature, the air can hold 7% more water . This is one of the reasons floods are becoming more common as the planet gets warmer. In August of 2017, Hurricane Harvey hit Texas, and it was the single largest rain event in U.S. history, dumping as much as 60 inches of rain in some places. According to climate scientists, Harvey flooded twice as many homes as it would have if there were no climate change. A few years later, in July of 2021, scientists were shocked by the scale of the floods in Germany. All over the country, precipitation reco...

The Jab: Is it the Mark of the Beast? If so how was it rolled out - A research project by @FreemanActual

Fair Use Act Disclaimer This web site and this post is for educational purposes only. Fair Use Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Fair Use Definition Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.

A New and Living Way through the Torah AND the faith of Yeshua

Throughout the book of Hebrews, a comparison is made between the new covenant and the old covenant. In every way, the new covenant in Christ is far superior to the old covenant. Because the new way is better, we should respond to it in a certain way. Notice what the author of Hebrews wrote: “ Therefore, brethren, since we have confidence to enter the holy place by the blood of Yeshua, by a new and living way which He inaugurated for us through the veil, that is, His flesh, and since we have a great priest over the house of YHWH, let us… ” (Hebrews 10:19-22). Following that statement, the Hebrew said, “ Let us ” do certain things. In the subsequent verses, we find three things we are to do now that we are a part of the “ new and living way ” in Christ. In this article, we will consider each of these. Let Us Draw Near with a Sincere Heart “ Let us draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled clean from a...

Search This Blog